Comparison · small SUVs
Ford Puma vs SEAT Arona: which is more reliable?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 100 for the SEAT Arona, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 102,902 real MOT tests in 2024.
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Ford Puma | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 105Above average | 101About average |
| 6–9 years | – | 94Below average |
| 10–14 years | – | – |
| 15+ years | 101About average | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Ford Puma | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| Tyres | 3.2 | 5.2 |
| Brakes | 2.3 | 5.9 |
| Lights & electrics | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Steering | 0.1 | 2.7 |
| Suspension | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| Emissions & leaks | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| Seat belts & airbags | 0.5 | 0.8 |
Ford Puma: top failures
SEAT Arona: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Ford Puma or the SEAT Arona?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 100 for the SEAT Arona, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Ford Puma and SEAT Arona can be compared?
Both were tested for 3 registration years (2019–2021). The Ford Puma had the higher pass rate in 3 of them and the SEAT Arona in 0.
What fails most on each?
Ford Puma: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; headlamp aim: too high. SEAT Arona: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; track rod end: ball joint dust cover excessively damaged or deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt.