Comparison · small SUVs
Peugeot 2008 vs Ford Puma: which is more reliable?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 92 for the Peugeot 2008, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 180,018 real MOT tests in 2024.
Peugeot 2008
Ford Puma
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Peugeot 2008 | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 98About average | 105Above average |
| 6–9 years | 90Well below average | – |
| 10–14 years | 87Well below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | 101About average |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Peugeot 2008 | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 12.2 | 2.5 |
| Body & chassis | 9.0 | 0.6 |
| Tyres | 5.2 | 3.2 |
| Brakes | 5.5 | 2.3 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 4.0 | 1.8 |
| Suspension | 4.5 | 1.2 |
| Emissions & leaks | 3.4 | 0.9 |
| Seat belts & airbags | 0.4 | 0.5 |
Peugeot 2008: top failures
Ford Puma: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Peugeot 2008 or the Ford Puma?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 92 for the Peugeot 2008, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Peugeot 2008 and Ford Puma can be compared?
Both were tested for 3 registration years (2019–2021). The Peugeot 2008 had the higher pass rate in 0 of them and the Ford Puma in 3.
What fails most on each?
Peugeot 2008: joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt; registration plate lamp(s): inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps. Ford Puma: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; headlamp aim: too high.