Comparison · small SUVs
Peugeot 2008 vs SEAT Arona: which is more reliable?
The SEAT Arona does better at the MOT, with a score of 100 against 92 for the Peugeot 2008, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 170,000 real MOT tests in 2024.
Peugeot 2008
SEAT Arona
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Peugeot 2008 | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 98About average | 101About average |
| 6–9 years | 90Well below average | 94Below average |
| 10–14 years | 87Well below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Peugeot 2008 | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 12.2 | 2.4 |
| Brakes | 5.5 | 5.9 |
| Tyres | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Body & chassis | 9.0 | 0.2 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 4.0 | 1.9 |
| Suspension | 4.5 | 0.7 |
| Emissions & leaks | 3.4 | 0.7 |
| Steering | 0.6 | 2.7 |
Peugeot 2008: top failures
SEAT Arona: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Peugeot 2008 or the SEAT Arona?
The SEAT Arona does better at the MOT, with a score of 100 against 92 for the Peugeot 2008, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Peugeot 2008 and SEAT Arona can be compared?
Both were tested for 5 registration years (2017–2021). The Peugeot 2008 had the higher pass rate in 1 of them and the SEAT Arona in 4.
What fails most on each?
Peugeot 2008: joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt; registration plate lamp(s): inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps. SEAT Arona: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; track rod end: ball joint dust cover excessively damaged or deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt.