Comparison · small SUVs
Nissan Juke vs Ford Puma: which is more reliable?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 93 for the Nissan Juke, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 357,543 real MOT tests in 2024.
Nissan Juke
Ford Puma
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Nissan Juke | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 101About average | 105Above average |
| 6–9 years | 96Below average | – |
| 10–14 years | 85Well below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | 101About average |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Nissan Juke | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 14.4 | 1.2 |
| Brakes | 9.0 | 2.3 |
| Lights & electrics | 8.0 | 2.5 |
| Tyres | 6.5 | 3.2 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 7.2 | 1.8 |
| Steering | 5.8 | 0.1 |
| Emissions & leaks | 3.3 | 0.9 |
| Body & chassis | 2.6 | 0.6 |
Nissan Juke: top failures
Ford Puma: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Nissan Juke or the Ford Puma?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 93 for the Nissan Juke, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Nissan Juke and Ford Puma can be compared?
Both were tested for 3 registration years (2019–2021). The Nissan Juke had the higher pass rate in 0 of them and the Ford Puma in 3.
What fails most on each?
Nissan Juke: suspension arms - ball joint: ball joint excessively worn; track rod end: ball joint has excessive play. Ford Puma: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; headlamp aim: too high.