Comparison · small SUVs
Ford Ecosport vs Ford Puma: which is more reliable?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 96 for the Ford Ecosport, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 158,698 real MOT tests in 2024.
Ford Ecosport
Ford Puma
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Ford Ecosport | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 99About average | 105Above average |
| 6–9 years | 94Below average | – |
| 10–14 years | 94Below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | 101About average |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Ford Ecosport | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 12.8 | 2.5 |
| Tyres | 5.7 | 3.2 |
| Brakes | 6.5 | 2.3 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 3.4 | 1.8 |
| Emissions & leaks | 2.6 | 0.9 |
| Suspension | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| Body & chassis | 1.7 | 0.6 |
| Steering | 1.1 | 0.1 |
Ford Ecosport: top failures
Ford Puma: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Ford Ecosport or the Ford Puma?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 96 for the Ford Ecosport, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Ford Ecosport and Ford Puma can be compared?
Both were tested for 3 registration years (2019–2021). The Ford Ecosport had the higher pass rate in 0 of them and the Ford Puma in 3.
What fails most on each?
Ford Ecosport: stop lamp: not working; headlamp: not working on dipped beam. Ford Puma: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; headlamp aim: too high.