Comparison · small SUVs
Dacia Duster vs Ford Puma: which is more reliable?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 90 for the Dacia Duster, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 126,498 real MOT tests in 2024.
Dacia Duster
Ford Puma
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Dacia Duster | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 92Well below average | 105Above average |
| 6–9 years | 89Well below average | – |
| 10–14 years | 86Well below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | 101About average |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Dacia Duster | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 18.8 | 2.5 |
| Brakes | 7.9 | 2.3 |
| Tyres | 5.5 | 3.2 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 6.4 | 1.8 |
| Suspension | 4.9 | 1.2 |
| Body & chassis | 3.1 | 0.6 |
| Emissions & leaks | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| Steering | 2.3 | 0.1 |
Dacia Duster: top failures
Ford Puma: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Dacia Duster or the Ford Puma?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 90 for the Dacia Duster, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Dacia Duster and Ford Puma can be compared?
Both were tested for 3 registration years (2019–2021). The Dacia Duster had the higher pass rate in 0 of them and the Ford Puma in 3.
What fails most on each?
Dacia Duster: headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect; wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively. Ford Puma: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; headlamp aim: too high.