Comparison · small SUVs
Nissan Juke vs SEAT Arona: which is more reliable?
The SEAT Arona does better at the MOT, with a score of 100 against 93 for the Nissan Juke, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 347,525 real MOT tests in 2024.
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Nissan Juke | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 101About average | 101About average |
| 6–9 years | 96Below average | 94Below average |
| 10–14 years | 85Well below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Nissan Juke | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 14.4 | 0.7 |
| Brakes | 9.0 | 5.9 |
| Tyres | 6.5 | 5.2 |
| Lights & electrics | 8.0 | 2.4 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 7.2 | 1.9 |
| Steering | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Emissions & leaks | 3.3 | 0.7 |
| Body & chassis | 2.6 | 0.2 |
Nissan Juke: top failures
SEAT Arona: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Nissan Juke or the SEAT Arona?
The SEAT Arona does better at the MOT, with a score of 100 against 93 for the Nissan Juke, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona can be compared?
Both were tested for 5 registration years (2017–2021). The Nissan Juke had the higher pass rate in 3 of them and the SEAT Arona in 2.
What fails most on each?
Nissan Juke: suspension arms - ball joint: ball joint excessively worn; track rod end: ball joint has excessive play. SEAT Arona: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; track rod end: ball joint dust cover excessively damaged or deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt.