Comparison · small SUVs
Renault Captur vs Ford Puma: which is more reliable?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 98 for the Renault Captur, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 208,217 real MOT tests in 2024.
Renault Captur
Ford Puma
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Renault Captur | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 102About average | 105Above average |
| 6–9 years | 98About average | – |
| 10–14 years | 92Below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | 101About average |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Renault Captur | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 9.4 | 1.2 |
| Tyres | 6.5 | 3.2 |
| Brakes | 7.2 | 2.3 |
| Lights & electrics | 6.3 | 2.5 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 3.9 | 1.8 |
| Body & chassis | 1.9 | 0.6 |
| Emissions & leaks | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| Seat belts & airbags | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Renault Captur: top failures
Ford Puma: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Renault Captur or the Ford Puma?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 98 for the Renault Captur, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Renault Captur and Ford Puma can be compared?
Both were tested for 3 registration years (2019–2021). The Renault Captur had the higher pass rate in 0 of them and the Ford Puma in 3.
What fails most on each?
Renault Captur: suspension arms - ball joint: ball joint excessively worn; tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm. Ford Puma: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; headlamp aim: too high.