Comparison · small SUVs
Ford Ecosport vs SEAT Arona: which is more reliable?
The SEAT Arona does better at the MOT, with a score of 100 against 96 for the Ford Ecosport, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 148,680 real MOT tests in 2024.
Ford Ecosport
SEAT Arona
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Ford Ecosport | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 99About average | 101About average |
| 6–9 years | 94Below average | 94Below average |
| 10–14 years | 94Below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Ford Ecosport | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 12.8 | 2.4 |
| Brakes | 6.5 | 5.9 |
| Tyres | 5.7 | 5.2 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 3.4 | 1.9 |
| Steering | 1.1 | 2.7 |
| Emissions & leaks | 2.6 | 0.7 |
| Suspension | 1.5 | 0.7 |
| Body & chassis | 1.7 | 0.2 |
Ford Ecosport: top failures
SEAT Arona: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Ford Ecosport or the SEAT Arona?
The SEAT Arona does better at the MOT, with a score of 100 against 96 for the Ford Ecosport, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Ford Ecosport and SEAT Arona can be compared?
Both were tested for 5 registration years (2017–2021). The Ford Ecosport had the higher pass rate in 2 of them and the SEAT Arona in 3.
What fails most on each?
Ford Ecosport: stop lamp: not working; headlamp: not working on dipped beam. SEAT Arona: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; track rod end: ball joint dust cover excessively damaged or deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt.