Comparison · small SUVs
Vauxhall Mokka vs Ford Puma: which is more reliable?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 92 for the Vauxhall Mokka, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 286,117 real MOT tests in 2024.
Vauxhall Mokka
Ford Puma
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Vauxhall Mokka | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 98About average | 105Above average |
| 6–9 years | 90Well below average | – |
| 10–14 years | 93Below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | 101About average |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Vauxhall Mokka | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 13.8 | 1.2 |
| Lights & electrics | 10.1 | 2.5 |
| Tyres | 6.0 | 3.2 |
| Brakes | 6.3 | 2.3 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 5.3 | 1.8 |
| Emissions & leaks | 3.7 | 0.9 |
| Steering | 3.1 | 0.1 |
| Body & chassis | 1.9 | 0.6 |
Vauxhall Mokka: top failures
Ford Puma: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Vauxhall Mokka or the Ford Puma?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 92 for the Vauxhall Mokka, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Vauxhall Mokka and Ford Puma can be compared?
Both were tested for 2 registration years (2019–2021). The Vauxhall Mokka had the higher pass rate in 0 of them and the Ford Puma in 2.
What fails most on each?
Vauxhall Mokka: suspension arms - ball joint dust cover: ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt; coil spring: fractured or broken. Ford Puma: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; headlamp aim: too high.