Comparison · small SUVs
Toyota C-HR vs SEAT Arona: which is more reliable?
The Toyota C-HR does better at the MOT, with a score of 102 against 100 for the SEAT Arona, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 130,909 real MOT tests in 2024.
Toyota C-HR
SEAT Arona
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Toyota C-HR | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 102Above average | 101About average |
| 6–9 years | 101About average | 94Below average |
| 10–14 years | – | – |
| 15+ years | – | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Toyota C-HR | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| Tyres | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Lights & electrics | 6.5 | 2.4 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 5.9 | 1.9 |
| Brakes | 1.6 | 5.9 |
| Steering | 0.1 | 2.7 |
| Suspension | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| Seat belts & airbags | 0.1 | 0.8 |
| Emissions & leaks | 0.0 | 0.7 |
Toyota C-HR: top failures
SEAT Arona: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Toyota C-HR or the SEAT Arona?
The Toyota C-HR does better at the MOT, with a score of 102 against 100 for the SEAT Arona, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Toyota C-HR and SEAT Arona can be compared?
Both were tested for 5 registration years (2017–2021). The Toyota C-HR had the higher pass rate in 3 of them and the SEAT Arona in 2.
What fails most on each?
Toyota C-HR: wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively; headlamp: not working on dipped beam. SEAT Arona: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; track rod end: ball joint dust cover excessively damaged or deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt.