Comparison · small SUVs
Toyota C-HR vs Ford Puma: which is more reliable?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 102 for the Toyota C-HR, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 140,927 real MOT tests in 2024.
Toyota C-HR
Ford Puma
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Toyota C-HR | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 102Above average | 105Above average |
| 6–9 years | 101About average | – |
| 10–14 years | – | – |
| 15+ years | – | 101About average |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Toyota C-HR | Ford Puma |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 6.5 | 2.5 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 5.9 | 1.8 |
| Tyres | 4.2 | 3.2 |
| Brakes | 1.6 | 2.3 |
| Suspension | 0.5 | 1.2 |
| Emissions & leaks | 0.0 | 0.9 |
| Body & chassis | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| Seat belts & airbags | 0.1 | 0.5 |
Toyota C-HR: top failures
Ford Puma: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Toyota C-HR or the Ford Puma?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 102 for the Toyota C-HR, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Toyota C-HR and Ford Puma can be compared?
Both were tested for 3 registration years (2019–2021). The Toyota C-HR had the higher pass rate in 0 of them and the Ford Puma in 3.
What fails most on each?
Toyota C-HR: wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively; headlamp: not working on dipped beam. Ford Puma: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; headlamp aim: too high.