Comparison · small SUVs
Vauxhall Mokka vs SEAT Arona: which is more reliable?
The SEAT Arona does better at the MOT, with a score of 100 against 92 for the Vauxhall Mokka, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 276,099 real MOT tests in 2024.
Vauxhall Mokka
SEAT Arona
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Vauxhall Mokka | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 98About average | 101About average |
| 6–9 years | 90Well below average | 94Below average |
| 10–14 years | 93Below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Vauxhall Mokka | SEAT Arona |
|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 13.8 | 0.7 |
| Lights & electrics | 10.1 | 2.4 |
| Brakes | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Tyres | 6.0 | 5.2 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 5.3 | 1.9 |
| Steering | 3.1 | 2.7 |
| Emissions & leaks | 3.7 | 0.7 |
| Body & chassis | 1.9 | 0.2 |
Vauxhall Mokka: top failures
SEAT Arona: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Vauxhall Mokka or the SEAT Arona?
The SEAT Arona does better at the MOT, with a score of 100 against 92 for the Vauxhall Mokka, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Vauxhall Mokka and SEAT Arona can be compared?
Both were tested for 4 registration years (2017–2021). The Vauxhall Mokka had the higher pass rate in 2 of them and the SEAT Arona in 2.
What fails most on each?
Vauxhall Mokka: suspension arms - ball joint dust cover: ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt; coil spring: fractured or broken. SEAT Arona: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; track rod end: ball joint dust cover excessively damaged or deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt.