Comparison · small SUVs
Vauxhall Mokka vs Toyota C-HR: which is more reliable?
The Toyota C-HR does better at the MOT, with a score of 102 against 92 for the Vauxhall Mokka, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 314,124 real MOT tests in 2024.
Vauxhall Mokka
Toyota C-HR
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Vauxhall Mokka | Toyota C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 98About average | 102Above average |
| 6–9 years | 90Well below average | 101About average |
| 10–14 years | 93Below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Vauxhall Mokka | Toyota C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 10.1 | 6.5 |
| Suspension | 13.8 | 0.5 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 5.3 | 5.9 |
| Tyres | 6.0 | 4.2 |
| Brakes | 6.3 | 1.6 |
| Emissions & leaks | 3.7 | 0.0 |
| Steering | 3.1 | 0.1 |
| Body & chassis | 1.9 | 0.1 |
Vauxhall Mokka: top failures
Toyota C-HR: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Vauxhall Mokka or the Toyota C-HR?
The Toyota C-HR does better at the MOT, with a score of 102 against 92 for the Vauxhall Mokka, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Vauxhall Mokka and Toyota C-HR can be compared?
Both were tested for 5 registration years (2016–2021). The Vauxhall Mokka had the higher pass rate in 0 of them and the Toyota C-HR in 5.
What fails most on each?
Vauxhall Mokka: suspension arms - ball joint dust cover: ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt; coil spring: fractured or broken. Toyota C-HR: wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively; headlamp: not working on dipped beam.