Comparison · small SUVs
Peugeot 2008 vs Toyota C-HR: which is more reliable?
The Toyota C-HR does better at the MOT, with a score of 102 against 92 for the Peugeot 2008, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 208,025 real MOT tests in 2024.
Peugeot 2008
Toyota C-HR
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Peugeot 2008 | Toyota C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 98About average | 102Above average |
| 6–9 years | 90Well below average | 101About average |
| 10–14 years | 87Well below average | – |
| 15+ years | – | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Peugeot 2008 | Toyota C-HR |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 12.2 | 6.5 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 4.0 | 5.9 |
| Tyres | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| Body & chassis | 9.0 | 0.1 |
| Brakes | 5.5 | 1.6 |
| Suspension | 4.5 | 0.5 |
| Emissions & leaks | 3.4 | 0.0 |
| Steering | 0.6 | 0.1 |
Peugeot 2008: top failures
Toyota C-HR: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Peugeot 2008 or the Toyota C-HR?
The Toyota C-HR does better at the MOT, with a score of 102 against 92 for the Peugeot 2008, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Peugeot 2008 and Toyota C-HR can be compared?
Both were tested for 6 registration years (2016–2021). The Peugeot 2008 had the higher pass rate in 0 of them and the Toyota C-HR in 6.
What fails most on each?
Peugeot 2008: joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt; registration plate lamp(s): inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps. Toyota C-HR: wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively; headlamp: not working on dipped beam.