Comparison · small SUVs
Ford Puma vs Skoda Kamiq: which is more reliable?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 102 for the Skoda Kamiq, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 71,853 real MOT tests in 2024.
Ford Puma
Skoda Kamiq
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Ford Puma | Skoda Kamiq |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 105Above average | 102Above average |
| 6–9 years | – | – |
| 10–14 years | – | – |
| 15+ years | 101About average | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Ford Puma | Skoda Kamiq |
|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 2.3 | 6.2 |
| Tyres | 3.2 | 3.7 |
| Lights & electrics | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 1.8 | 1.1 |
| Emissions & leaks | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| Suspension | 1.2 | 0.1 |
| Seat belts & airbags | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Body & chassis | 0.6 | 0.1 |
Ford Puma: top failures
Skoda Kamiq: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Ford Puma or the Skoda Kamiq?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 102 for the Skoda Kamiq, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Ford Puma and Skoda Kamiq can be compared?
Both were tested for 3 registration years (2019–2021). The Ford Puma had the higher pass rate in 3 of them and the Skoda Kamiq in 0.
What fails most on each?
Ford Puma: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; headlamp aim: too high. Skoda Kamiq: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords.