Comparison · small SUVs
Ford Puma vs Hyundai Kona: which is more reliable?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 101 for the Hyundai Kona, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 100,474 real MOT tests in 2024.
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Ford Puma | Hyundai Kona |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 105Above average | 100About average |
| 6–9 years | – | 106Above average |
| 10–14 years | – | – |
| 15+ years | 101About average | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Ford Puma | Hyundai Kona |
|---|---|---|
| Tyres | 3.2 | 5.8 |
| Lights & electrics | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 1.8 | 3.9 |
| Brakes | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| Suspension | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Emissions & leaks | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| Body & chassis | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Seat belts & airbags | 0.5 | 0.1 |
Ford Puma: top failures
Hyundai Kona: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Ford Puma or the Hyundai Kona?
The Ford Puma does better at the MOT, with a score of 105 against 101 for the Hyundai Kona, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona can be compared?
Both were tested for 3 registration years (2019–2021). The Ford Puma had the higher pass rate in 3 of them and the Hyundai Kona in 0.
What fails most on each?
Ford Puma: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; headlamp aim: too high. Hyundai Kona: wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively; tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords.