Comparison · family SUVs
Ford Kuga vs Skoda Karoq: which is more reliable?
The Ford Kuga and Skoda Karoq are very close at the MOT: scores of 103 and 105. Pick on the condition and history of the actual car. Based on 337,837 real MOT tests in 2024.
Ford Kuga
Skoda Karoq
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Ford Kuga | Skoda Karoq |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 102About average | 104Above average |
| 6–9 years | 104Above average | 108Above average |
| 10–14 years | 103Above average | – |
| 15+ years | 102Above average | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Ford Kuga | Skoda Karoq |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 9.3 | 2.4 |
| Tyres | 6.3 | 4.7 |
| Brakes | 6.2 | 2.0 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 4.2 | 1.2 |
| Suspension | 3.2 | 1.7 |
| Emissions & leaks | 2.0 | 0.4 |
| Body & chassis | 1.7 | 0.1 |
| Steering | 0.9 | 0.1 |
Ford Kuga: top failures
Skoda Karoq: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Ford Kuga or the Skoda Karoq?
The Ford Kuga and Skoda Karoq are very close at the MOT: scores of 103 and 105. Pick on the condition and history of the actual car.
Which years of the Ford Kuga and Skoda Karoq can be compared?
Both were tested for 4 registration years (2018–2021). The Ford Kuga had the higher pass rate in 2 of them and the Skoda Karoq in 2.
What fails most on each?
Ford Kuga: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; position lamp: not working. Skoda Karoq: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick.