Comparison · family SUVs
Ford Kuga vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: which is more reliable?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque does better at the MOT, with a score of 107 against 103 for the Ford Kuga, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 465,800 real MOT tests in 2024.
Ford Kuga
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Ford Kuga | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 102About average | 101About average |
| 6–9 years | 104Above average | 108Above average |
| 10–14 years | 103Above average | 114Well above average |
| 15+ years | 102Above average | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Ford Kuga | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 9.3 | 5.5 |
| Tyres | 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Brakes | 6.2 | 4.6 |
| Suspension | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 4.2 | 1.8 |
| Emissions & leaks | 2.0 | 2.3 |
| Body & chassis | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| Steering | 0.9 | 0.2 |
Ford Kuga: top failures
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Ford Kuga or the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque does better at the MOT, with a score of 107 against 103 for the Ford Kuga, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Ford Kuga and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be compared?
Both were tested for 11 registration years (2011–2021). The Ford Kuga had the higher pass rate in 3 of them and the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque in 8.
What fails most on each?
Ford Kuga: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; position lamp: not working. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords.