Comparison · family SUVs
Honda CR-V vs Skoda Karoq: which is more reliable?
The Honda CR-V does better at the MOT, with a score of 109 against 105 for the Skoda Karoq, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 246,873 real MOT tests in 2024.
Honda CR-V
Skoda Karoq
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Honda CR-V | Skoda Karoq |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 107Above average | 104Above average |
| 6–9 years | 112Well above average | 108Above average |
| 10–14 years | 119Well above average | – |
| 15+ years | 100About average | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Honda CR-V | Skoda Karoq |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 15.7 | 2.4 |
| Suspension | 11.4 | 1.7 |
| Tyres | 5.4 | 4.7 |
| Brakes | 6.8 | 2.0 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 4.6 | 1.2 |
| Emissions & leaks | 3.4 | 0.4 |
| Body & chassis | 2.9 | 0.1 |
| Steering | 2.6 | 0.1 |
Honda CR-V: top failures
Skoda Karoq: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Honda CR-V or the Skoda Karoq?
The Honda CR-V does better at the MOT, with a score of 109 against 105 for the Skoda Karoq, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Honda CR-V and Skoda Karoq can be compared?
Both were tested for 4 registration years (2018–2021). The Honda CR-V had the higher pass rate in 3 of them and the Skoda Karoq in 1.
What fails most on each?
Honda CR-V: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm; position lamp: not working. Skoda Karoq: tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords; brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick.