Comparison · family SUVs
Ford Kuga vs Honda CR-V: which is more reliable?
The Honda CR-V does better at the MOT, with a score of 109 against 103 for the Ford Kuga, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 480,582 real MOT tests in 2024.
Ford Kuga
Honda CR-V
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Ford Kuga | Honda CR-V |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 102About average | 107Above average |
| 6–9 years | 104Above average | 112Well above average |
| 10–14 years | 103Above average | 119Well above average |
| 15+ years | 102Above average | 100About average |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Ford Kuga | Honda CR-V |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 9.3 | 15.7 |
| Suspension | 3.2 | 11.4 |
| Brakes | 6.2 | 6.8 |
| Tyres | 6.3 | 5.4 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Emissions & leaks | 2.0 | 3.4 |
| Body & chassis | 1.7 | 2.9 |
| Steering | 0.9 | 2.6 |
Ford Kuga: top failures
Honda CR-V: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Ford Kuga or the Honda CR-V?
The Honda CR-V does better at the MOT, with a score of 109 against 103 for the Ford Kuga, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Ford Kuga and Honda CR-V can be compared?
Both were tested for 14 registration years (2008–2021). The Ford Kuga had the higher pass rate in 0 of them and the Honda CR-V in 14.
What fails most on each?
Ford Kuga: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; position lamp: not working. Honda CR-V: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm; position lamp: not working.