2004–2021 · 77,122 MOT tests

Mitsubishi Outlander MOT pass rate by year

How every year of the Mitsubishi Outlander did at its MOT in 2024, compared with the average car of the same age.

101About average
Best year201680.1% passed
Worst year200547.0% passed
Rank in Mitsubishi7 of 12

Pass rate by year of registration

25%50%75%100%2004: 50.0% passed (average for its age 56.4%)042005: 47.0% passed (average for its age 56.5%)2007: 49.8% passed (average for its age 56.9%)072008: 51.6% passed (average for its age 56.9%)2009: 51.5% passed (average for its age 58.4%)092010: 56.8% passed (average for its age 59.6%)2011: 59.1% passed (average for its age 61.8%)112012: 64.0% passed (average for its age 64.3%)2013: 61.7% passed (average for its age 66.8%)132014: 69.0% passed (average for its age 69.9%)2015: 74.0% passed (average for its age 73.5%)152016: 80.1% passed (average for its age 76.6%)2017: 83.0% passed (average for its age 79.8%)172018: 85.4% passed (average for its age 82.5%)2019: 86.7% passed (average for its age 84.9%)192020: 86.0% passed (average for its age 86.9%)2021: 84.5% passed (average for its age 87.6%)21

Pass rate first time Average for a car that age

Every year

YearTestsPassedAverageScore
2021 Outlander2,54084.5%87.6%
96Below average
2020 Outlander5,25086.0%86.9%
99About average
2019 Outlander8,63886.7%84.9%
102Above average
2018 Outlander10,74185.4%82.5%
104Above average
2017 Outlander8,96983.0%79.8%
104Above average
2016 Outlander11,08880.1%76.6%
105Above average
2015 Outlander12,88274.0%73.5%
101About average
2014 Outlander7,09669.0%69.9%
99About average
2013 Outlander2,05561.7%66.8%
92Below average
2012 Outlander1,11264.0%64.3%
100About average
2011 Outlander1,28559.1%61.8%
96Below average
2010 Outlander1,40656.8%59.6%
95Below average
2009 Outlander1,22651.5%58.4%
88Well below average
2008 Outlander1,51351.6%56.9%
91Well below average
2007 Outlander1,01649.8%56.9%
88Well below average
2005 Outlander15147.0%56.5%
83Well below average
2004 Outlander15450.0%56.4%
89Well below average

Common failures, all years

Share of all 77,122 tests.

  1. Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick2.4%
  2. Position lamp: not working1.9%
  3. Tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords1.6%
  4. Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm1.6%
  5. Track rod end: ball joint has excessive play1.5%
  6. Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively1.5%
  7. Suspension arms - ball joint: ball joint excessively worn1.1%
  8. Service brake performance: excessively binding0.9%

Other Mitsubishi models

ModelMOT testsMOT Rank score
Mitsubishi L20086,156
96Below average
Mitsubishi Asx28,817
103Above average
Mitsubishi Shogun26,988
104Above average
Mitsubishi Colt21,259
92Below average
Mitsubishi Eclipse11,076
102About average
Mitsubishi Mirage10,968
107Above average
Mitsubishi Lancer9,086
112Well above average
Mitsubishi Shogun Sport4,139
98About average