1997–2021 · 86,156 MOT tests

Mitsubishi L200 MOT pass rate by year

How every year of the Mitsubishi L200 did at its MOT in 2024, compared with the average car of the same age.

96Below average
Best year201678.2% passed
Worst year199852.5% passed
Rank in Mitsubishi9 of 12

Pass rate by year of registration

25%50%75%100%1997: 64.8% passed (average for its age 65.5%)971998: 52.5% passed (average for its age 64.9%)1999: 60.6% passed (average for its age 63.3%)992000: 57.9% passed (average for its age 61.5%)2001: 54.7% passed (average for its age 59.4%)012002: 54.5% passed (average for its age 58.1%)2003: 56.9% passed (average for its age 57.3%)032004: 55.4% passed (average for its age 56.4%)2005: 54.6% passed (average for its age 56.5%)052006: 54.4% passed (average for its age 56.1%)2007: 54.1% passed (average for its age 56.9%)072008: 52.8% passed (average for its age 56.9%)2009: 51.8% passed (average for its age 58.4%)092010: 55.1% passed (average for its age 59.6%)2011: 55.0% passed (average for its age 61.8%)112012: 59.8% passed (average for its age 64.3%)2013: 62.2% passed (average for its age 66.8%)132014: 63.2% passed (average for its age 69.9%)2015: 69.4% passed (average for its age 73.5%)152016: 78.2% passed (average for its age 76.6%)2017: 79.5% passed (average for its age 79.8%)172018: 82.0% passed (average for its age 82.5%)2019: 83.2% passed (average for its age 84.9%)192020: 84.2% passed (average for its age 86.9%)2021: 86.7% passed (average for its age 87.6%)21

Pass rate first time Average for a car that age

Every year

YearTestsPassedAverageScore
2021 L2002,48586.7%87.6%
99About average
2020 L2004,53484.2%86.9%
97Below average
2019 L2008,60283.2%84.9%
98About average
2018 L2007,73782.0%82.5%
99About average
2017 L2007,97479.5%79.8%
100About average
2016 L2006,55478.2%76.6%
102Above average
2015 L2006,57769.4%73.5%
94Below average
2014 L2004,71263.2%69.9%
90Well below average
2013 L2003,76562.2%66.8%
93Below average
2012 L2002,94059.8%64.3%
93Below average
2011 L2004,13555.0%61.8%
89Well below average
2010 L2003,67655.1%59.6%
92Below average
2009 L2002,43851.8%58.4%
89Well below average
2008 L2002,62152.8%56.9%
93Below average
2007 L2003,97454.1%56.9%
95Below average
2006 L2004,87754.4%56.1%
97Below average
2005 L2002,88354.6%56.5%
97Below average
2004 L2002,22055.4%56.4%
98About average
2003 L2001,61556.9%57.3%
99About average
2002 L20080654.5%58.1%
94Below average
2001 L20041554.7%59.4%
92Below average
2000 L20022857.9%61.5%
94Below average
1999 L20016060.6%63.3%
96Below average
1998 L20012052.5%64.9%
81Well below average
1997 L20010864.8%65.5%
99About average

Common failures, all years

Share of all 86,156 tests.

  1. Position lamp: not working4.6%
  2. Rigid brake pipes: excessively corroded4.0%
  3. Rear fog lamp: not working3.4%
  4. Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively2.5%
  5. Joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt2.2%
  6. Suspension arms - ball joint: ball joint excessively worn2.0%
  7. Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick1.4%
  8. Leaf spring: fractured1.1%

Other Mitsubishi models

ModelMOT testsMOT Rank score
Mitsubishi Outlander77,122
101About average
Mitsubishi Asx28,817
103Above average
Mitsubishi Shogun26,988
104Above average
Mitsubishi Colt21,259
92Below average
Mitsubishi Eclipse11,076
102About average
Mitsubishi Mirage10,968
107Above average
Mitsubishi Lancer9,086
112Well above average
Mitsubishi Shogun Sport4,139
98About average