Comparison · family SUVs
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Mazda CX-5: which is more reliable?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque does better at the MOT, with a score of 107 against 103 for the Mazda CX-5, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 245,307 real MOT tests in 2024.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Mazda CX-5
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 101About average | 102About average |
| 6–9 years | 108Above average | 104Above average |
| 10–14 years | 114Well above average | 102Above average |
| 15+ years | – | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Mazda CX-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyres | 6.1 | 4.4 |
| Brakes | 4.6 | 5.2 |
| Lights & electrics | 5.5 | 3.6 |
| Suspension | 3.1 | 6.0 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 1.8 | 3.3 |
| Emissions & leaks | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Steering | 0.2 | 2.6 |
| Body & chassis | 1.3 | 0.2 |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: top failures
Mazda CX-5: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque or the Mazda CX-5?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque does better at the MOT, with a score of 107 against 103 for the Mazda CX-5, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Mazda CX-5 can be compared?
Both were tested for 10 registration years (2012–2021). The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque had the higher pass rate in 7 of them and the Mazda CX-5 in 3.
What fails most on each?
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; tyres - condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords. Mazda CX-5: brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick; wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively.