Comparison · small hatchbacks
Fiat 500 vs Renault Clio: which is more reliable?
The Fiat 500 does better at the MOT, with a score of 95 against 83 for the Renault Clio, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 641,958 real MOT tests in 2024.
Fiat 500
Renault Clio
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | Fiat 500 | Renault Clio |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 100About average | 95Below average |
| 6–9 years | 93Below average | 83Well below average |
| 10–14 years | 94Below average | 78Well below average |
| 15+ years | 94Below average | 83Well below average |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | Fiat 500 | Renault Clio |
|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 18.4 | 23.5 |
| Lights & electrics | 13.2 | 28.1 |
| Brakes | 10.1 | 15.9 |
| Tyres | 7.5 | 9.2 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 5.1 | 8.5 |
| Body & chassis | 3.7 | 5.9 |
| Emissions & leaks | 3.6 | 3.8 |
| Steering | 0.7 | 6.5 |
Fiat 500: top failures
Renault Clio: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the Fiat 500 or the Renault Clio?
The Fiat 500 does better at the MOT, with a score of 95 against 83 for the Renault Clio, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the Fiat 500 and Renault Clio can be compared?
Both were tested for 15 registration years (2007–2021). The Fiat 500 had the higher pass rate in 15 of them and the Renault Clio in 0.
What fails most on each?
Fiat 500: suspension arms - pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn; shock absorbers: has an excessively worn bush. Renault Clio: suspension arms - ball joint: ball joint excessively worn; coil spring: fractured or broken.