Comparison · executive cars
BMW 3 Series vs Jaguar XE: which is more reliable?
The BMW 3 Series does better at the MOT, with a score of 110 against 103 for the Jaguar XE, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 523,237 real MOT tests in 2024.
BMW 3 Series
Jaguar XE
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | BMW 3 Series | Jaguar XE |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 100About average | 97Below average |
| 6–9 years | 108Above average | 104Above average |
| 10–14 years | 110Well above average | – |
| 15+ years | 115Well above average | – |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | BMW 3 Series | Jaguar XE |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 11.8 | 5.4 |
| Tyres | 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Brakes | 9.0 | 5.3 |
| Suspension | 8.2 | 2.1 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Emissions & leaks | 3.6 | 1.9 |
| Body & chassis | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Seat belts & airbags | 1.1 | 0.7 |
BMW 3 Series: top failures
Jaguar XE: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the BMW 3 Series or the Jaguar XE?
The BMW 3 Series does better at the MOT, with a score of 110 against 103 for the Jaguar XE, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the BMW 3 Series and Jaguar XE can be compared?
Both were tested for 7 registration years (2015–2021). The BMW 3 Series had the higher pass rate in 7 of them and the Jaguar XE in 0.
What fails most on each?
BMW 3 Series: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm; shock absorbers: has a serious fluid leak. Jaguar XE: stop lamp: not working; tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm.