1998–2012 · 17,648 MOT tests

Volvo S40 MOT pass rate by year

How every year of the Volvo S40 did at its MOT in 2024, compared with the average car of the same age.

97Below average
Best year200658.0% passed
Worst year199951.9% passed
Rank in Volvo14 of 17

Pass rate by year of registration

25%50%75%100%1998: 63.4% passed (average for its age 64.9%)981999: 51.9% passed (average for its age 63.3%)992000: 54.4% passed (average for its age 61.5%)002001: 53.3% passed (average for its age 59.4%)012002: 48.6% passed (average for its age 58.1%)022003: 49.0% passed (average for its age 57.3%)032004: 52.7% passed (average for its age 56.4%)042005: 54.8% passed (average for its age 56.5%)052006: 58.0% passed (average for its age 56.1%)062007: 57.9% passed (average for its age 56.9%)072008: 56.6% passed (average for its age 56.9%)082009: 58.9% passed (average for its age 58.4%)092010: 57.4% passed (average for its age 59.6%)102011: 57.8% passed (average for its age 61.8%)112012: 62.4% passed (average for its age 64.3%)12

Pass rate first time Average for a car that age

Every year

YearTestsPassedAverageScore
2012 S401,26962.4%64.3%
97Below average
2011 S401,44457.8%61.8%
93Below average
2010 S401,95257.4%59.6%
96Below average
2009 S402,36958.9%58.4%
101About average
2008 S402,84856.6%56.9%
99About average
2007 S401,79657.9%56.9%
102About average
2006 S401,66158.0%56.1%
103Above average
2005 S401,41754.8%56.5%
97Below average
2004 S401,10652.7%56.4%
93Below average
2003 S4062449.0%57.3%
86Well below average
2002 S4042848.6%58.1%
84Well below average
2001 S4028753.3%59.4%
90Well below average
2000 S4020654.4%61.5%
88Well below average
1999 S4012951.9%63.3%
82Well below average
1998 S4011263.4%64.9%
98Below average

Common failures, all years

Share of all 17,648 tests.

  1. Coil spring: fractured or broken5.0%
  2. Position lamp: not working4.8%
  3. Joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt4.4%
  4. Suspension arms - pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn3.7%
  5. Tyres - condition: has ply or cords exposed2.6%
  6. Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm2.3%
  7. Rbt (sp): efficiency below requirements1.8%
  8. Suspension arms - ball joint: ball joint excessively worn1.7%

Other Volvo models

ModelMOT testsMOT Rank score
Volvo XC60110,040
105Above average
Volvo V4093,590
97Below average
Volvo XC4071,230
105Above average
Volvo XC9070,440
102About average
Volvo V7039,643
103Above average
Volvo V6039,116
103Above average
Volvo V5028,998
93Below average
Volvo C3022,230
98Below average