2009–2012 · 3,802 MOT tests

Toyota Urban Cruiser MOT pass rate by year

How every year of the Toyota Urban Cruiser did at its MOT in 2024, compared with the average car of the same age.

116Well above average
Best year201172.2% passed
Worst year200966.6% passed
Rank in Toyota5 of 29

Pass rate by year of registration

25%50%75%100%2009: 66.6% passed (average for its age 58.4%)20092010: 69.4% passed (average for its age 59.6%)20102011: 72.2% passed (average for its age 61.8%)20112012: 74.0% passed (average for its age 64.3%)2012

Pass rate first time Average for a car that age

Every year

YearTestsPassedAverageScore
2012 Urban Cruiser54974.0%64.3%
115Well above average
2011 Urban Cruiser93372.2%61.8%
117Well above average
2010 Urban Cruiser1,12169.4%59.6%
117Well above average
2009 Urban Cruiser1,19966.6%58.4%
114Well above average

Common failures, all years

Share of all 3,802 tests.

  1. Position lamp: not working5.0%
  2. Rigid brake pipes: excessively corroded3.1%
  3. Malfunction indicator lamp: inoperative or indicates a malfunction2.4%
  4. Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick2.0%
  5. Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively1.8%
  6. Electronic stability control: warning lamp indicates a fault1.8%
  7. Headlamp aim: projected beam image is obviously incorrect1.3%
  8. Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm1.1%

Other Toyota models

ModelMOT testsMOT Rank score
Toyota Yaris454,697
104Above average
Toyota Aygo254,234
104Above average
Toyota Prius153,991
108Above average
Toyota Auris151,013
106Above average
Toyota RAV4127,775
108Well above average
Toyota Corolla109,266
103Above average
Toyota C-HR84,467
102About average
Toyota Hilux72,557
95Below average