2002–2010 · 5,799 MOT tests

Daihatsu Sirion MOT pass rate by year

How every year of the Daihatsu Sirion did at its MOT in 2024, compared with the average car of the same age.

106Above average
Best year201070.6% passed
Worst year200355.7% passed
Rank in Daihatsu2 of 4

Pass rate by year of registration

25%50%75%100%2002: 61.2% passed (average for its age 58.1%)20022003: 55.7% passed (average for its age 57.3%)20032005: 57.9% passed (average for its age 56.5%)20052006: 57.1% passed (average for its age 56.1%)20062007: 59.8% passed (average for its age 56.9%)20072008: 61.9% passed (average for its age 56.9%)20082009: 64.7% passed (average for its age 58.4%)20092010: 70.6% passed (average for its age 59.6%)2010

Pass rate first time Average for a car that age

Every year

YearTestsPassedAverageScore
2010 Sirion10970.6%59.6%
119Well above average
2009 Sirion89364.7%58.4%
111Well above average
2008 Sirion1,81161.9%56.9%
109Well above average
2007 Sirion1,32459.8%56.9%
105Above average
2006 Sirion70957.1%56.1%
102About average
2005 Sirion71057.9%56.5%
102Above average
2003 Sirion12255.7%57.3%
97Below average
2002 Sirion12161.2%58.1%
105Above average

Common failures, all years

Share of all 5,799 tests.

  1. Suspension arms - ball joint: ball joint excessively worn8.7%
  2. Linkage ball joints: ball joint excessively worn3.1%
  3. Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively2.9%
  4. Rigid brake pipes: excessively corroded2.8%
  5. Position lamp: not working2.2%
  6. Stop lamp: not working2.2%
  7. Component mounting prescribed areas: prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength2.1%
  8. Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm1.9%

Other Daihatsu models

ModelMOT testsMOT Rank score
Daihatsu Terios3,750
105Above average
Daihatsu Copen1,166
122Well above average
Daihatsu Charade1,080
103Above average