Comparison · family hatchbacks
BMW 1 Series vs Kia Ceed: which is more reliable?
The BMW 1 Series does better at the MOT, with a score of 106 against 93 for the Kia Ceed, comparing each with cars of the same age. Based on 492,549 real MOT tests in 2024.
BMW 1 Series
Kia Ceed
By age
MOT Rank score for each age group (100 = an average car that age).
| Age at test | BMW 1 Series | Kia Ceed |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 years | 102Above average | 97Below average |
| 6–9 years | 105Above average | 99About average |
| 10–14 years | 107Above average | 88Well below average |
| 15+ years | 112Well above average | 87Well below average |
Year by year
Share that passed first time, same registration year.
Problem areas
Failure items per 100 tests.
| Area | BMW 1 Series | Kia Ceed |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & electrics | 11.4 | 18.5 |
| Brakes | 7.3 | 15.7 |
| Tyres | 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Suspension | 6.0 | 11.1 |
| Visibility (wipers, screen, mirrors) | 4.4 | 6.3 |
| Steering | 0.5 | 5.0 |
| Emissions & leaks | 2.7 | 2.3 |
| Body & chassis | 1.3 | 1.9 |
BMW 1 Series: top failures
Kia Ceed: top failures
Questions
Which is more reliable, the BMW 1 Series or the Kia Ceed?
The BMW 1 Series does better at the MOT, with a score of 106 against 93 for the Kia Ceed, comparing each with cars of the same age.
Which years of the BMW 1 Series and Kia Ceed can be compared?
Both were tested for 15 registration years (2007–2021). The BMW 1 Series had the higher pass rate in 15 of them and the Kia Ceed in 0.
What fails most on each?
BMW 1 Series: tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm; shock absorbers: has a serious fluid leak. Kia Ceed: track rod end: ball joint has excessive play; tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm.